UNE PETITION INTERNATIONALE EN ANGLAIS SUR LA TOILE

CETTE PETITION INITIEE AUX ANTIPODES (EN AUSTRALIE) ET ACCESSIBLE PAR LE SITE GREC ENOURANIS - lien ci dessus- A ATTEINT QUASIMENT LE MEME NOMBRE DE SIGNATURES QUE LA NOTRE.....BELLE SYNERGIE DONC!! ALORS....UNISSONS NOS FORCES!!!


petition overview | letter
Investigate Persistent Contrails AKA Chemtrails
Target:
Peter Garrett, AM, MP Labor Member for Kingsford Smith Minister for Environment, Heritage and the Arts
Sponsored by:
Phillip Davis

We the people, request an immediate, thorough, and honest investigation into what the substances labeled "chemtrails" actually consists of and to discover the true purpose of "chemtrail" operations in this country and across the globe. Such investigations must include independent, impartial experts, as well as individuals and groups..

Please read the letter to Target. Please take the time to share this petition.
Peter Garrett,

Thankyou for taking the time to read this.

Chemtrail aware individuals and groups are getting tired of seeing whited-out man made skies. Without a credible explanation, many of us have come to the conclusion that a cover up is underway at some level. The purpose of this petition is to assist in raising public confidence to ultimately demand a serious and open public debate on Chemtrails, as silence has prevailed for too long.

Peter you are widely known as a passionate advocate and campaigner on a range of contemporary Australian and global issues, as a fellow activist will you help our cause by addressing this issue within your office? It has become obvious that there are too many people with too many questions for the public to be ignored any longer.

Please see: http://www.bluenomore.com/

Thank you and we await your detailed response.
signature
goal: 2,000

915
signatures!

Aucun commentaire:

Publier un commentaire

Postez ici votre commentaire.
Nous publions tous les commentaires sauf ceux comportant des mots injurieux et les incompréhensibles.
Avis aux lecteurs: les commentaires ne reflètent pas nécessairement l'opinion et la ligne de conduite de l'ACSEIPICA.